Backcountry Skiing

 

Re: strap-ons

Booker Bense wrote:
> In article <5sr3a0F1agm1uU1@mid.individual.net>,
> dardruba wrote:
>
>> I've no idea what the military use these days but I presume they must have a
>> binding which grips a walking/working boot.
>> If so that should work on your boots.
>>
>
> I believe it's called a NATO binding for obvious
> reasons. Rottefella makes it, Model 120. I think.

There is also a US military binding made by Ramer
(I think that's the manufacturer). They sometimes
come on ebay. I bought a set for about $25. Haven't
mounted them up yet as we have had a few dry winters.

This winter is beginning to shape up nicely though,
and I plan to have a lot less work on my house to do.

The Ramer bindings look like they can be made to fit
most anything. They were the binding of choice for
alpine touring 30 years ago. There was an article
in Powder last year about some early alpine touring
(1970's) and the gear they were using was mountaineering
boots, long skis and military bindings.

Heavy weight stuff to be sure, but might suit your
needs in the binding department as least.

> I think the OP would be a lot better off switching to
> a different boot maker. Not everybody has alpina shaped
> feet, the other XC boots have a significantly different fit.
>
> For example, Alpina's kill my feet, but I'm perfectly happy in
> Rossignol boots.
>
> _ Booker C. Bense
>
>
>

 

Article References :

Re: strap-ons
Re: strap-ons
strap-ons
Re: strap-ons
Re: strap-ons
 

See Also : Re: Skis and Bindings to match Alico Ski Tour Skate Boots

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In article <10uft5bjsr6j2fe@corp.supernews.com>,
Ryan Pfleger wrote:
>Hi I was looking for some an advice for a beginner on what skis and bindings
>to match to a pair of leather Alico Ski Tour Skate Boots. They have a 6"
>cuff and are a little beefier than the normal Ski Tours, but still no
>plastic buckles. I have done a little BC and track skiing in the distant
>past (I was probably 14), but more recently my only experience has been
>alpine. I want an all around ski, with an emphasis on touring.
>The two ski's I am looking at are the Fischer Rebound, and the Alpina Lite
>Terrain. Would these be good ski's to match with the boots?

_ Both are good choices, my preference would be the Fischers
since they are lighter and better skis IMHO. You might also
consider the wider Fischer S-Bounds if you don't plan to do much
track skiing.

> Are there
>others that come to mind? What about length? I am 5'11", 160lbs. Would
>170's be right? 180's?

_ It really depends on testing the camber, but if you plan to
cover ground, then I would reccommend 180s. Get shorter if
you plan on bushwacking. There is an Atomic version of this
kind of ski as well. I don't have any experience with them,
but I highly reccommend the Fischer's if your budget allows.

> What about bindings? I have been thinking about
>Voile Hardwire 3-Pins. Is this more binding then I need, or would it be
>useful at times?

_ That's entirely dependent on your turning skills. Since you
haven't done much light ski/boot turning recently, I think the
Hardwire would be a good choice. You will likely have some
relearning to do to master parallel turns on light skis and
boots. It's always good to have options. In general, I think it's
easier to learn on heavy stiffer stuff and then transition to
lighter gear as your skill improves.

_ Booker C. Bense



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBQegPrmTWTAjn5N/lAQGx5QP/aVBFa5ZEaNRVbU4eZUWMxxn+K3caGuRA
TYEhnN+wVwJY6T299scrhybRNeUU4pgSBffTxXmbf2tMuGiX2KPayRf6V8JvijSe
utZloW0RXJvt0G8+sOsy6hBjatgCXZbTn5qfKO+vXygImALkFh3cpT9D8TYh9x8D
2cafGigGU0I=
=EhdV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----